User talk:VW77

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Rogue Jello. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox.

You may find Uncyclopedia more amenable to this kind of content. -- Fr a ncs2000 13:02, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Deadblow

Thank you for your article Deadblow. It has been proposed for deletion Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deadblow|here. Kindly come and justify why you feel this subject merits an article. I have voted to retain the article.--File Éireann 20:43, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Here are a few links you might find helpful:

You can sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on [[User talk:{{{1}}}|my talk page]]. Or, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

We're so glad you're here!--File Éireann 20:43, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Deadblow

The article Deadblow has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of how this might meet notability guidelines. Lacks citations to significant coverage in reliable sources. Might be mergable to Battlebots but does not warrant a dedicated article.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RadioFan (talk) 15:31, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Blendo

The article Blendo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of how this might meet notability guidelines. Lacks citations to significant coverage in reliable sources. Might be mergable to Battlebots or Hyneman or Savage's articles but does not warrant a dedicated article.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RadioFan (talk) 15:31, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]